From entry of the final written order (or its mailing or e-service), or from the ruling on a timely post-trial motion. C.A.R. 4(a).

Colorado Family Law Appeals: Divorce, Custody, Maintenance & Property Decisions
An appeal is not a new trial: no new witnesses, generally no new evidence, and believing the judge was wrong is not enough, because many family-law rulings receive substantial deference. The deadlines are short, some orders need magistrate review first, and appeals are expensive. Sometimes a post-trial motion or a modification is the better tool. This is the candid version, as of September 2026.
- 01The deadline warning
- 02What an appeal really costs
- 03Do you actually have an appeal?
- 04Judge or magistrate?
- 05Every deadline, in order
- 06Standards of review
- 07The appeal, step by step
- 08When an appeal is the wrong tool
- →What people ask first
Talk to us about your case.
303-507-5529One call. A real person picks up, hears you out, and tells you how we would handle what you are facing and what to do first. No phone tree, no sales pitch, no obligation. Your first conversation is with our intake paralegal, who will get you to Aaron fast.
Rather write? Send a short note and during business hours we call you back within the hour.
Most people who ask me about an appeal want a second trial. Colorado does not offer one.
An appeal asks a narrow question: did the trial court make a legal error, on the record that already exists, that changed the result? The Court of Appeals reads the order, the transcripts and the exhibits. It hears no witnesses and takes no new evidence. Its judges were not in the courtroom, so they defer to the judge who was: on credibility, on supported findings, and on the many decisions the law leaves to the trial court’s discretion. Believing the judge was wrong is where an appeal starts. What wins is a preserved, reviewable error that mattered.
Then the clock and the cost. The notice of appeal is due 49 days after the final written order; a magistrate’s order goes first to a district judge, within 28 days. A contested appeal commonly costs tens of thousands of dollars and runs more than a year. So a serious review answers two questions: is there an appealable error, and is pursuing it economically rational? Sometimes the answer is a different procedure: a post-trial motion, reconsideration, a modification. The rules below are current as of September 2026.
Reviewed by Aaron Herzberg · Colorado Attorney · Updated September 2026

For magistrate orders issued on or after January 2, 2026, a petition to a district judge comes first. C.R.M. 7.
A timely C.R.C.P. 59 motion suspends the appeal clock until it is decided or deemed denied on day 63.
Up to 35 days, granted by the Court of Appeals only for excusable neglect. C.A.R. 4(a)(4).
Appeal deadline warning: the clock started when the order was signed.
The rules treat a timely notice of appeal as the one step that cannot be missed: a late notice ordinarily ends the appeal, however strong the issue (C.A.R. 3(a), 4(a)). The Court of Appeals can add up to 35 days, and only for excusable neglect. The amended magistrate rule has no extension provision at all.
Do not wait until the end of an appeal deadline to consult appellate counsel.
A real review needs the order, the docket, the transcripts and the exhibits. A call in the last week leaves time to protect the deadline, not to decide whether to appeal. Four things change the date:
- Judge or magistrate. A magistrate’s order goes to a district judge first, within 28 days. Skipping that step forfeits the appeal.
- A post-trial motion. A timely C.R.C.P. 59 motion restarts the 49 days from the ruling, or from day 63 if there is none.
- Finality. Permanent orders are not final while a fee request under C.R.S. § 14-10-119 is pending. A premature notice may be dismissed; a late one is fatal.
- Temporary financial orders. Temporary maintenance, support and fee orders are appealable now, not after permanent orders.
Whether an order is final can itself be a legal issue (below). I count from the docket, not the caption.
What does a Colorado family-law appeal really cost?
Appeals are expensive legal projects. If the amount genuinely at stake is substantially less than the expected cost of the appeal, pursuing an appeal may not make financial sense even if there is a legitimate legal issue. These are the budget ranges clients should be prepared to discuss.
Approximate planning budgets for serious appellate representation — not market averages
| Matter | Budget range clients should be prepared to discuss |
|---|---|
| Initial appellate case and record review | $5,000–$10,000 |
| Magistrate petition for district-court review | $10,000–$20,000+ |
| Focused Court of Appeals matter with a limited record | $25,000–$40,000+ |
| Typical contested family-law appeal | $35,000–$60,000+ |
| Complex custody, maintenance, business, property or large-record appeal | $50,000–$100,000+ |
| Cross-appeal, multiple complex issues, or a very large record | $75,000–$125,000+ |
| Colorado Supreme Court certiorari after the Court of Appeals | Potentially an additional $15,000–$30,000+ for the petition stage; substantially more if the petition is granted |
Planning ranges for the legal work, not averages of what Colorado lawyers charge and not a quote. Transcripts, record preparation, filing fees, expert consultation and other outside expenses can be additional.
What moves the number.
The number and complexity of the issues; the length of the transcripts, which must be read in full, and the size of the record; the briefing, which a cross-appeal extends by two briefs; motions for extensions, record supplements or a stay; oral argument; and a remand, which is a second project, not a footnote.
The outside costs.
Court of Appeals docket fees are $253 for the appellant and $178 for the appellee, including the $30 equal-justice fee added January 1, 2025 (C.R.S. § 13-4-112); a certiorari petition is $225 (List of Fees). Some state pages still show $223 and a $250 cost bond; the bond rule, C.A.R. 7, was repealed in 2022. Transcripts cost $3.60 a page at the ordinary rate (Chief Justice Directive 05-03), and the Judicial Branch’s quick guide estimates about $150 per hour of court time.
The economics, candidly.
An appeal that costs $50,000 to correct a $30,000 error is a poor investment even if it wins. The calculation changes with a major property dispute, a business valuation, long-term maintenance, high-income support, a significant parenting ruling, or an order with years of consequences, which is why high-asset and business-owner clients ask it first. Parenting decisions may not reduce to dollars at all. And winning often means a remand, not a new result.
If the cost is out of reach.
Limited resources do not end the conversation. Filing and record fees can be waived for a household at or below 125 percent of the federal poverty line or on listed public benefits; the motion (JDF 205) goes first to the trial court, and its order must be entered no earlier than 12 months before the notice of appeal (C.A.R. 12(b)(2)). The Colorado Bar Association’s Civil Appeals Clinic offers self-represented parties a free, confidential one-hour meeting with a volunteer lawyer, with no income limit; its Appellate Pro Bono Program places a small number of financially qualified cases with volunteer counsel. My representation is private, paid representation.
The first engagement: a merits review.
Before anyone commits to an appeal, I review the order and the record as a separately scoped engagement. It answers both questions, error and economics, before you spend the larger sum; what it covers is below.
Do you actually have an appeal?
Six questions decide it. Most people can answer the first three themselves.
Signs an appeal may be real.
- A final order, or a magistrate’s order inside its 28-day window
- A deadline that is still open
- A legal error you can state in one sentence: a wrong standard, a missing finding, a misread statute
- An issue raised in the trial court by objection, argument, offer of proof or motion
- A transcript, or one that can still be prepared
- An error that changed the result, with more at stake than the appeal costs
Signs it is not an appeal.
- The judge believed the other side
- The best evidence is evidence the judge never saw
- The issue was never raised before the ruling
- No recording or transcript exists
- A lawful ruling that is not the result you wanted
- The facts changed after the hearing: a modification question

Why an appeal is not a do-over.
The Court of Appeals reviews the record the trial court made. It does not make a new one.
No new witnesses, generally no new evidence. The record is what was filed, offered and said below (C.A.R. 10). The appellate judges read the hearing; they cannot repair a failure of proof, the appraisal nobody obtained or the witness nobody called. An argument never made to the trial judge generally cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. Without a transcript, the court presumes the evidence supported the findings (In re Marriage of Beatty, 2012 COA 71). Credibility belongs to the judge who watched the witness.
An example. Suppose you believe a witness lied at trial. An appeal generally is not an opportunity to bring in three new witnesses proving that person lied. The question is whether the judge committed a reviewable legal error on the record that was made. If proof of the lie was offered and wrongly excluded, that ruling may be an issue. If it surfaced after the judgment, it belongs in a motion for relief from the judgment, on that rule’s deadlines.
An appeal is decided on the record that was made, not on the case you would try now.
Was your order entered by a judge or a magistrate?
It is the first thing I check. A district court magistrate may hear most domestic-relations matters without consent, including motions to modify permanent orders, but a contested permanent-orders hearing only with consent (C.R.M. 6(b)). For magistrate orders issued on or after January 2, 2026, the review rules were rewritten.

The 2026 rules.
A petition to a district judge within 28 days; a motion to the magistrate pauses it; a 91-day deemed ruling; then the 49-day appeal clock.
Reviewable. Only a final order, one that fully resolves an issue or claim, and only once it is written, dated and signed; a signed minute order counts (C.R.M. 7(c)).
A motion to the magistrate first, if at all. Within 14 days, which cannot be extended, a party may ask the magistrate to reconsider (a manifest error, not disagreement) or to correct a clerical error. A timely motion pauses the 28 days; one not ruled on within 21 days after the opposition was due is deemed denied, and the 28 days start then (C.R.M. 7(e), (f)).
The petition states the errors with particularity. The district judge accepts the magistrate’s findings unless clearly erroneous, decides the law de novo, and, if no transcript was requested, presumes the record supports the findings (C.R.M. 7(h)–(j)). A petition undecided 91 days after it was timely filed is deemed an adoption of the order, and the 49-day appeal clock starts that day (C.R.M. 7(k)).
The magistrate clock, for orders issued on or after January 2, 2026
| Trigger | Days | Rule |
|---|---|---|
| The order is written, dated and signed | 28 to petition the district court | C.R.M. 7(a), (c), (d) |
| The same date | 14 to ask the magistrate to reconsider or correct clerical errors; no extension | C.R.M. 7(e) |
| A timely motion to the magistrate | The 28 days pause; opposition within 7 days of service; no reply | C.R.M. 7(e) |
| The date the opposition was due | 21 for a ruling, or the motion is deemed denied and the 28 start | C.R.M. 7(e) |
| The magistrate amends the order | 28 from the amended order | C.R.M. 7(f) |
| Service of the petition | 14 for an opposition; no reply | C.R.M. 7(h) |
| Timely filing of the petition | 91 for a ruling, or the order is deemed adopted | C.R.M. 7(k) |
| The district judge’s order, or the deemed adoption | 49 to file the notice of appeal | C.A.R. 4(a)(1); C.R.M. 7(k) |
Consent, older orders, and skipping review.
Consent cases now go through review too: the district court confirms consent was properly given and directs any appeal within 49 days (C.R.M. 7(g)); I calendar that from the date of its order. Skipping review forfeits the appeal: the magistrate’s order becomes the district court’s (C.R.M. 7(l), (m); In re Parental Responsibilities Concerning D.P.G., 2020 COA 115, under the former rule). Orders issued before January 2, 2026 follow the former rule: 14 days if the parties were present, 21 from mailing, consent orders appealed directly. Courthouse details are on the Denver metro family courts page.
Every deadline, in order.
Trigger, days, rule. Count under C.A.R. 26(a): skip the trigger day, count calendar days, and roll a weekend or legal-holiday deadline to the next business day. The magistrate clock is above. Do not wait until the end of an appeal deadline to consult appellate counsel.
In the trial court
| Trigger | Days | Rule |
|---|---|---|
| Entry of the final judgment: the date the written order is signed | 14 for a post-trial motion; extendable only if asked within the 14 | C.R.C.P. 58(a), 59(a), 6(b) |
| Filing of the last timely post-trial motion | 63 for a ruling, or the motion is deemed denied | C.R.C.P. 59(j) |
| The ruling on that motion, or its deemed denial | 49 to file the notice of appeal | C.A.R. 4(a)(3) |
In the Court of Appeals
| Trigger | Days | Rule |
|---|---|---|
| Entry of the final order, or the mailing or e-service of notice of it | 49 to file the notice of appeal | C.A.R. 4(a)(1), (5) |
| Expiration of the 49 days | Up to 35 more, only for excusable neglect | C.A.R. 4(a)(4); 26(c) |
| The first notice of appeal is filed | 14 for a cross-appeal, or the rest of the 49 if later | C.A.R. 4(a)(2) |
| Entry of a temporary maintenance, support or fee order | 49; lost once permanent orders are entered | Mockelmann; Salby |
| The notice of appeal is filed | 7 for the appellant to designate transcripts; 14 for the appellee | C.A.R. 10(d) |
| The notice of appeal is filed | 63 to transmit the record, unless extended | C.A.R. 10(c)(2) |
| The record is filed | 42 for the opening brief | C.A.R. 31(a) |
| Service of the opening brief | 35 for the answer brief | C.A.R. 31(a) |
| Service of the answer brief | 21 for the reply brief | C.A.R. 31(a) |
| The briefs are closed | 7 to request oral argument | C.A.R. 34(a) |
After the Court of Appeals decides
| Trigger | Days | Rule |
|---|---|---|
| Entry of the Court of Appeals’ judgment | 14 for a petition for rehearing | C.A.R. 40(a) |
| The same judgment, with no rehearing petition | 42 for a petition for certiorari | C.A.R. 52(b)(1) |
| Rehearing denied, or a new or modified opinion | 28 for a petition for certiorari | C.A.R. 52(b)(1) |
| Service of a certiorari petition | 14 for an opposition; 7 for an optional reply | C.A.R. 53(c), (d) |
| Entry of the judgment | Mandate no earlier than 42; a timely certiorari petition stays it | C.A.R. 41 |
Why finality can itself be the legal question.
Identifying the final order is not always simple. Permanent orders are not final while a fee request under C.R.S. § 14-10-119 is pending; an appeal filed then may be dismissed without prejudice (Hill). A decree entered before permanent orders is not final unless certified under C.R.C.P. 54(b) (Burford). A contempt order is final once a complete sanction is imposed (January). A premature notice may be dismissed; a late one is fatal. When in doubt, I calendar the earliest date that could apply.
Post-trial motions, and the other side’s appeal.
A timely C.R.C.P. 59 motion stops the clock for every party until it is decided or deemed denied. It is not a precondition to an appeal, but it can fix an error faster; a C.R.C.P. 60(b) motion stops nothing. If your former spouse appealed, note the 14-day cross-appeal window above; the answer brief must respond on the standard of review and preservation for each issue (C.A.R. 28(b)).
Final, temporary, interlocutory: which orders can be appealed.
The Court of Appeals reviews final judgments (C.R.S. § 13-4-102(1)). In family cases finality has its own case law, and whether an order can be appealed depends on the order and its posture, never on its subject alone.
| Order | Appealable? | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| Permanent orders resolving every issue, including attorney fees | Yes, within 49 days | In re Marriage of Wiggs, 2025 COA 10 |
| Permanent orders with a fee request under C.R.S. § 14-10-119 pending | Not yet; a notice may be dismissed without prejudice | In re Marriage of Hill, 166 P.3d 269 (Colo. App. 2007) |
| A decree entered before permanent orders | Not unless certified under C.R.C.P. 54(b) | Estate of Burford v. Burford, 935 P.2d 943 (Colo. 1997) |
| Temporary maintenance, child support or attorney-fee orders | Yes, immediately; not after permanent orders are entered | In re Marriage of Mockelmann, 944 P.2d 670 (Colo. App. 1997); In re Marriage of Salby, 126 P.3d 291 (Colo. App. 2005) |
| Temporary custody or parenting-time orders | No | In re Marriage of Adams, 778 P.2d 294 (Colo. App. 1989); In re Marriage of Fickling, 100 P.3d 571 (Colo. App. 2004) |
| A permanent protection order in a pending dissolution case | Yes | Wiggs |
| A post-decree order on a motion to modify | Once the motion is fully resolved; magistrate review first where a magistrate ruled | In re Marriage of Thorburn, 2022 COA 80; C.R.M. 7 |
| A contempt order | Once contempt is adjudicated and a complete sanction imposed; a denial of contempt is final | In re Marriage of January, 2019 COA 87 |
The narrow exceptions: C.A.R. 4.2 and C.A.R. 21.
C.A.R. 4.2 allows a discretionary interlocutory appeal only on the trial court’s certification or all parties’ stipulation, for a controlling and unresolved question of law (C.R.S. § 13-4-102.1), on 14-day clocks; the Court of Appeals may still decline.
C.A.R. 21 is an original proceeding in the Supreme Court, an extraordinary remedy generally reserved for cases where an appeal would be inadequate, the harm irreparable, or the issue new and of public importance. The Court used it in a 2024 divorce case on personal jurisdiction (In re Marriage of Green, 2024 CO 24). It is not a second route to review.
Standards of review: how much deference the trial judge gets.
The opening brief must state the standard of review, with authority, for each issue (C.A.R. 28(a)(7)(A)). The standard decides more family-law appeals than the facts do.
| Standard | Applies to | What it means | Authority |
|---|---|---|---|
| De novo | Pure questions of law: statutory interpretation, the correct legal standard, jurisdiction | The appellate court decides the question itself, without deference, but only the legal question, not the facts beneath it. | Dale, 2026 CO 35; Capparelli, 2024 COA 103; Boettcher, 2019 CO 81 |
| Clearly erroneous | Findings of fact | A finding stands if the record supports it, even if the appellate judges would have found otherwise. | S.Z.S., 2022 COA 105; Wiggs; C.R.M. 7(j) |
| Abuse of discretion | Most family-law decisions: property division, maintenance, the support amount, parenting time, fee awards | Not whether the appellate judges would decide differently, but whether the decision was manifestly arbitrary, unreasonable or unfair. | Gibbs, 2019 COA 104; Balanson, 25 P.3d 28 (Colo. 2001) |
| Mixed questions | Classifying property; a legal test applied to found facts | Supported findings are accepted; the legal conclusion drawn from them is reviewed de novo. | Capparelli |
| Other standards | Evidentiary rulings; unpreserved arguments; appeals after magistrate review | Evidentiary rulings: generally abuse of discretion, and an error must have affected a substantial right. Unpreserved arguments: generally not reviewed. After magistrate review: effectively a second layer of appellate review. | C.R.E. 103(a); Estate of Stevenson v. Hollywood Bar & Cafe, Inc., 832 P.2d 718 (Colo. 1992); In re Marriage of Clark, 2025 COA 75 |
Why discretionary decisions are rarely disturbed.
The trial judge heard the witnesses, weighed the evidence and made the calls the statutes assign to the trial court: what is equitable, what is reasonable, what serves a child. Reversal is difficult, and many family-law rulings are affirmed because appellate courts defer to supported factual findings and discretionary decisions. The Judicial Branch publishes no reversal rate for domestic-relations appeals, and I do not estimate one. It does publish time: in fiscal year 2024 these appeals, when decided by opinion, averaged 428 days from notice to opinion (Colorado Judicial Branch, FY2024 Annual Statistical Report, Table 12).
Where an appeal has a real argument.
- The wrong legal standard
- Required statutory findings missing, or too thin to review
- A misconstrued statute
- A factor the law does not permit
- A required factor left out
- A finding with no record support
- A math or support-calculation error
- Property classified under the wrong rule
- A defect in jurisdiction
- A denial of procedural due process
- A prejudicial evidentiary error
- A failure to exercise discretion at all
- A ruling beyond the court’s authority
What still has to be true.
- It was raised and ruled on below, and the brief can cite where
- The transcript and the exhibits show it
- It changed the result; an error that did not is harmless
- You did not invite it
- Winning, usually a remand, is worth what it costs
A standard of review is not a technicality. It is the question the appellate court is allowed to ask.
Issue by issue: how each kind of ruling is reviewed.
Whether an issue can be appealed, and how it is reviewed, depends on the specific order and its posture. The rows give the usual approach; none means that every order in a category is appealable.
Property, maintenance, income and support
| Issue | Usually reviewed | What tends to matter |
|---|---|---|
| Property division | Abuse of discretion; great latitude to divide equitably, not necessarily equally (In re Marriage of Balanson, 25 P.3d 28 (Colo. 2001)) | Values found and the division explained (In re Marriage of Capparelli, 2024 COA 103) |
| Marital or separate | Findings for record support; the classification de novo (Capparelli) | Tracing, and the right legal test |
| Business valuation | A finding; the court may choose among supported expert opinions | A legal error, not a quarrel over a discount |
| Valuation date | Set by statute: the date of the decree, or of an earlier property hearing (C.R.S. § 14-10-113(5)) | The required date; support for the value |
| Maintenance amount and term | Abuse of discretion (Capparelli; In re Marriage of Gibbs, 2019 COA 104) | Findings on the statutory factors and the guideline |
| Income findings | Record support; what counts as income is a legal question | Returns, business records, add-backs |
| Imputed income | Voluntariness and potential income are findings (C.R.S. § 14-10-115(5)(b)) | Evidence of real earning capacity |
| Child support | Abuse of discretion; the legal standard de novo (In re Marriage of Boettcher, 2019 CO 81) | Guideline math, income inputs, overnights |
| Retroactive support | Legal limits on how far back; discretion within them | The filing date and the governing statute |
Children, and everything else
| Issue | Usually reviewed | What tends to matter |
|---|---|---|
| Parenting time and parental responsibilities | Every presumption in favor of the ruling; findings stand with record support (In re Parental Responsibilities Concerning S.Z.S., 2022 COA 105) | Best-interests findings, and the right standard: a modification is not a restriction (In re Marriage of Dale, 2026 CO 35) |
| Decision-making | The same deference; the governing standard de novo | The statute’s standard for the change |
| Relocation | Best interests, no presumption, abuse of discretion (In re Marriage of Ciesluk, 113 P.3d 135 (Colo. 2005)) | Findings on the factors; no order to live in a particular place (Spahmer v. Gullette, 113 P.3d 158 (Colo. 2005)) |
| Attorney-fee awards | Abuse of discretion under C.R.S. § 14-10-119 (In re Marriage of Aragon, 2019 COA 76) | Findings on the parties’ financial resources |
| Contempt and enforcement | Once the proceeding is resolved; contempt, on a complete sanction (January) | Whether the order ended the proceeding |
| Post-decree modifications | Once the motion is fully resolved; magistrate review first | The statute’s standard for the change |
| Protection orders | A permanent order in a pending divorce is appealable (Wiggs) | Evidence for the statutory findings |
| Evidentiary rulings | Generally abuse of discretion; a substantial right must be affected (C.R.E. 103(a)) | An objection or an offer of proof |
| Statutory meaning, jurisdiction, due process | Legal questions, de novo | The text; notice and a hearing |
| Sanctions | Generally abuse of discretion | The rule relied on and the findings |
Rows without a case state the general approach; the authority for a particular ruling is part of the review.
Things that often sound like appeals, but aren’t good appellate arguments.
“The judge believed my spouse.”
Credibility belongs to the judge who watched the testimony, and is almost never reviewable unless it rests on a legal error.
“The judge was unfair.”
Unfairness describes a result. The question is whether a specific ruling was legally wrong and preserved. Bias is a separate claim, generally raised first in the trial court.
“My ex lied.”
Contradicted testimony is what hearings resolve. Proof of the lie belonged at the hearing; fraud discovered later is a motion for relief from the judgment.
“I have better evidence now.”
The record is closed. New facts belong in a modification; evidence that should have been disclosed, in a motion under the disclosure rules.
“I would present it differently.”
An appeal reviews the rulings made on the case that was presented, not the case you would present now.
“I disagree with the schedule.”
A schedule is a best-interests judgment, reviewed with every presumption in its favor. A wrong standard might be error; disagreement is not.
“The division feels unfair.”
Colorado requires an equitable division, not an equal one. A misclassified or unvalued asset may be error; an unequal result is not.
“My ex hid money.”
Usually a trial-court matter: five years of retained jurisdiction over assets left out of the disclosures. See Reopening the Property Division.
“Things have changed since the hearing.”
A later change is not an error in the order. It is a modification, decided in the trial court on new evidence.
Preservation: the appeal is built in the trial court.
An argument the trial judge was never asked to decide generally cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, and the opening brief must cite where each issue was raised and ruled on (C.A.R. 28(a)(7)(A); Estate of Stevenson, 832 P.2d 718 (Colo. 1992)).

What preserves an issue.
An objection with its ground, an offer of proof, an argument the judge actually ruled on, and a transcript that shows all of it.
The objection: timely, on the record, with the reason stated. An objection made in the hallway does not exist on appeal.
The offer of proof: when evidence is excluded, the record must show what it would have been, or the appellate court cannot tell whether the exclusion mattered.
The argument: the theory on appeal must be the one the trial judge decided. Asking for specific findings, or pointing out missing ones in a post-trial motion, helps preserve a findings issue.
The record: exhibits identified by number, transcripts of every hearing that matters and, failing those, a statement of the evidence (C.A.R. 10(e)), a weaker substitute.
Invited error, waiver, forfeiture: a party may not complain of an error it invited (Horton v. Suthers, 43 P.3d 611 (Colo. 2002)), such as a valuation date it proposed. A right knowingly given up is waived; an argument not made in time is usually forfeited.
The trial lawyer builds the appeal. After more than seventy bench trials, that is how I try cases, and it is the first thing I look for in a record someone else made.
The appeal, step by step: a plan, not a promise.
Twelve steps, from the order to the mandate: rule deadlines and official averages, not predictions.
- Step 01 · Days 1–14Evaluation
Finality, who signed the order, the deadline, and whether a post-trial motion or a motion to the magistrate comes first.
- Step 02 · 14 or 28 daysPost-trial motion or magistrate review
C.R.C.P. 59 within 14 days of a judge’s order; a petition within 28 days of a magistrate’s.
- Step 03 · Within 49 daysNotice of appeal
Filed with the $253 fee. The one step that cannot be cured late.
- Step 04 · 14 days afterCross-appeal
The other side’s window, or the rest of its own 49 days if later.
- Step 05 · 7 days after the noticeTranscripts
Designated and paid for; the appellee may add more within 14 days.
- Step 06 · About 63 daysThe record
Transmitted once the transcripts are ready: 73 days on average in FY2024.
- Step 07 · 42 days after the recordOpening brief
Up to 9,500 words: the standard of review and preservation for each issue, and any fee request (C.A.R. 39.1).
- Step 08 · 35 days laterAnswer brief
The appellee’s response, issue by issue.
- Step 09 · 21 days laterReply brief
Optional, up to 5,700 words. Record to at-issue averaged 167 days in FY2024.
- Step 10 · 7 days after briefs closeOral argument request
The court may decide without argument; if heard, usually 15 minutes a side.
- Step 11 · Months laterDecision
An opinion or an order: 428 days from notice, on average, in FY2024.
- Step 12 · 14 to 42 days afterRehearing, certiorari, mandate, remand
Rehearing within 14 days; certiorari within 42; the mandate no earlier than 42 days; then any remand.
What the Court of Appeals can do: winning often means going back.
An appellate decision is rarely a new judgment in your favor. In family cases it is usually an instruction to the trial court, which decides again a year or more after the order: sometimes better, sometimes the same result with better findings, sometimes a new balance across connected issues.
| Outcome | What it means | What usually follows |
|---|---|---|
| Affirmed | The order stands; the court may affirm without an opinion (C.A.R. 35(a)). | The order continues; a bill of costs, and any fee request, follow. |
| Reversed | A ruling was legally wrong. | Usually a remand to decide the issue again under the correct law. |
| Reversed in part | Some rulings stand and some do not. | Property, maintenance and support are intertwined; related orders may be revisited. |
| Vacated | The order is set aside, often for missing findings or a wrong standard. | New findings or a new decision, on the record or after a hearing. |
| Remanded | Sent back with directions. | The mandate defines what may be reconsidered. The result can be the same. |
Appellate fees. A fee request must appear in the principal brief under its own heading, with its legal and factual basis (C.A.R. 39.1). Under the family-law fee statute the Court of Appeals often leaves the question to the trial court, which is better placed to assess current finances (Clark, 2025 COA 75). See attorney fees and costs.
Does the appeal stop the order? Usually not.
A notice of appeal suspends nothing. Support keeps coming due, the parenting plan stays in effect, and a money judgment can be collected after a brief automatic stay. Keep complying while you challenge the order; no one can promise a stay.
| Order | Automatic stay? | How relief is sought | Rule |
|---|---|---|---|
| Money judgment (an equalization payment reduced to judgment, a fee award) | Only for 14 days after entry | A supersedeas bond, presumptively 125 percent of the judgment unless the court orders otherwise | C.R.C.P. 62(a), (d); C.R.C.P. 121 § 1-23(3)(a) |
| Maintenance and child support | No; payments keep coming due | A motion, first in the district court, which may also modify these orders during the appeal | C.A.R. 8(a); C.R.S. § 14-10-122(1)(a) |
| Parenting time and decision-making | No | A discretionary stay, requested first in the district court, which may also modify these orders during the appeal | C.A.R. 8(a); C.R.S. § 14-10-129(1)(a)(I); C.R.S. § 14-10-131(2) |
| Property transfers and other non-money orders | Generally only the 14 days after entry | Any bond is set case by case, and the court may deny a stay | C.R.C.P. 62; § 1-23, comment [2] |
| Protection orders | No | A motion to suspend or modify the order pending appeal | C.A.R. 8(a) |
An appeal may not be your best remedy.
Other procedures address problems with a family-court order, each with its own standard and deadline. Which one fits depends on the problem and the posture of the case. This is a map, not advice about which to use.
| Procedure | What it addresses | Timing | Rule |
|---|---|---|---|
| Post-trial motion | Amended findings or judgment, or a new trial, from the judge who ruled | 14 days after entry; suspends the appeal clock | C.R.C.P. 59 |
| Magistrate review | A district judge’s review of a magistrate’s final order | 28 days (orders on or after Jan. 2, 2026) | C.R.M. 7 |
| Reconsideration | A manifest error in a non-final order; disfavored | 14 days, with a good-cause exception | C.R.C.P. 121 § 1-15(11) |
| Clerical correction | A clerical slip or oversight, not a change of mind | Within 14 days for a magistrate’s order; otherwise not tied to the appeal clock | C.R.C.P. 60(a); C.R.M. 7(e) |
| Relief from judgment | Mistake, excusable neglect, fraud or misconduct, a void or satisfied judgment | 182 days for mistake, neglect or fraud; otherwise a reasonable time; no pause of the appeal clock | C.R.C.P. 60(b) |
| Undisclosed assets | Material assets or debts left out of the disclosures | 5 years after the decree | C.R.C.P. 16.2(e)(10); Reopening the Property Division |
| Modification | A change since the order, under that order’s statute | When the facts support it; support changes generally reach back only to the filing date | C.R.S. § 14-10-122; C.R.S. § 14-10-129; Modifying Orders |
| Enforcement | An order that is not being obeyed | When the violation occurs | Enforcement & Contempt |
| Clarification | An ambiguous term; a clarification interprets, it does not change | Promptly | A motion to the trial court |
| Negotiated resolution | Settlement at any stage, including during an appeal | Any time | Mediation |
| Remand strategy | Planning the hearing that follows a successful appeal | Before the appeal is filed | — |
Appeal or modification? Two different questions.
An appeal asks whether the order was legally wrong when it was entered. A modification asks whether circumstances have changed enough since then. Confusing them costs time on both.
| Appeal | Modification | |
|---|---|---|
| The question | Was there a reviewable legal error on the record? | Has something changed that the statute recognizes? |
| Evidence | The existing record only | New evidence of what changed |
| Where | The Court of Appeals, after magistrate review if a magistrate ruled | The trial court |
| Deadline | 49 days, with narrow exceptions | None in that sense; relief generally runs from the filing date |
| Maintenance | Abuse of discretion; findings on the statutory factors | Changed circumstances so substantial and continuing as to make the terms unfair, unless an agreement made it non-modifiable (C.R.S. § 14-10-122(1)(a)); Ending or Reducing Maintenance |
| Child support | Abuse of discretion; the legal standard de novo | A substantial and continuing change; a guideline change of less than ten percent is deemed not to be one (C.R.S. § 14-10-122(1)(b)); Modifying Child Support |
| Parenting time | Every presumption in favor of the ruling | The child’s best interests (C.R.S. § 14-10-129(1)(a)(I)); Modifying Custody |
| Majority-time parent, decision-making | The same deference | Changed circumstances plus one of the statute’s specific grounds (C.R.S. § 14-10-129(2); C.R.S. § 14-10-131) |
| Property division | Abuse of discretion; classification partly de novo | Not modifiable; reopened only on conditions that justify reopening a judgment (C.R.S. § 14-10-122(1)(a)) |
The two can run side by side: since 2021 the trial court keeps jurisdiction to modify maintenance, support, parenting time and decision-making during an appeal (C.R.S. § 14-10-122(1)(a); C.R.S. § 14-10-129(1)(a)(I); C.R.S. § 14-10-131(2)). But a modification does not cure a missed appeal deadline; it needs a change, not a disagreement.
After the Court of Appeals: rehearing, certiorari, the Supreme Court.
Family-law appeals go to the Court of Appeals first (C.R.S. § 13-4-102(1)). Supreme Court review is discretionary: a petition for certiorari asks the Court to take the case.
Rehearing is limited to points the court overlooked or misapprehended (C.A.R. 40). The certiorari deadlines, as amended March 26, 2026, are in the table above; the fee is $225, and a timely petition stays the mandate. The Court does take family cases: in May 2026 it decided In re Marriage of Dale, 2026 CO 35, holding that a purely quantitative cut in parenting time is a modification decided on best interests, not a restriction.
Budget: potentially an additional $15,000–$30,000+ for the petition stage, substantially more if the petition is granted.
The appellate case review: what I look at before you spend.
A review of the order and the record, scoped and priced on its own, before anyone commits to an appeal: whether you lost at trial, represented yourself, or are answering your former spouse’s appeal.
The order, the record, the law.
- The written order and every related order
- The docket, and whether the order is final
- Judge or magistrate, and the deadline that follows
- The transcripts, or whether they exist
- The exhibits offered, admitted and refused
- The motions, objections and offers of proof
- Whether each issue was preserved
- The governing statutes and cases
- The standard of review for each issue
An honest answer.
- Whether there is a reviewable legal error
- Whether it was preserved, and where the record shows it
- How the standard of review cuts
- What winning would realistically produce
- A budget, a timeline, and whether another procedure fits better
- A recommendation not to appeal, when that is the answer
What I tell every client who asks about an appeal.
Six things, in the order they come up. Not legal advice for your case.

- Calendar the right date today.
When the order was signed or e-served, who signed it, whether fees are pending. Then start well before the end.
- Find out whether a transcript exists.
Without one, the appellate court presumes the evidence supported the findings. Request it early.
- Name the error in one sentence.
A wrong standard, a missing finding, a misread statute, a finding with no evidence. If the sentence is about whom the judge believed, it is not an appellate issue.
- Price the appeal against what winning gets you.
Usually a remand to the same court, a year or more later. Compare that with the budget.
- Keep complying while you challenge it.
A notice of appeal stays nothing. Support, maintenance and the parenting plan continue unless a court orders otherwise.
- Ask what else would fix it.
A post-trial motion, a motion to the magistrate, a modification: each with its own standard and deadline.
An appeal does not ask whether you should have won. It asks whether the judge made a legal error, on the record that exists, that changed the result.
Start with the order and its date: ask for an appellate case review →
The appeal questions people ask first.
How long do I have to appeal a divorce decree in Colorado?
Generally 49 days from entry of the final written order, or from the date notice of it was mailed or e-served. A timely post-trial motion under C.R.C.P. 59 restarts the 49 days from the ruling on it, or from its deemed denial 63 days after filing. If a magistrate entered the order, you must first petition a district judge within 28 days (for orders issued on or after January 2, 2026), and the 49 days run from the judge’s ruling. Whether the order is final at all can itself be a question, so start early.
Can I appeal a custody decision?
A final order allocating parental responsibilities can be appealed; temporary custody and parenting-time orders cannot. The Court of Appeals reviews parenting decisions with every presumption in favor of the trial court and disturbs findings only when the record does not support them. The appeals with a realistic chance involve a legal error: the wrong standard, missing findings on the statutory factors, or a factor the law does not allow. A change in circumstances since the order is a modification, not an appeal.
Can I appeal a maintenance award?
Yes, as part of a final judgment, and a temporary maintenance order can be appealed immediately, though not after permanent orders are entered. Maintenance is reviewed for abuse of discretion: the question is whether the award was manifestly arbitrary, unreasonable or unfair, not whether the appellate judges would have chosen a different number. Awards are more vulnerable when the findings on the statutory factors and the guideline are missing or too thin to review. A later change in circumstances is a modification question.
Can I appeal a child support order?
Yes. Child support is reviewed for abuse of discretion, but whether the court applied the correct legal standard is reviewed de novo, so income errors, worksheet mistakes and misapplied guideline rules are among the more concrete issues. Temporary support orders are appealable immediately and lose that right once permanent orders are entered. If the numbers have changed since the order, a motion to modify in the trial court is the usual tool, not an appeal.
Can I appeal a property division?
Yes, as part of a final judgment. The trial court has great latitude to divide property equitably, which is not necessarily equally, and the division is reviewed for abuse of discretion. The stronger issues are usually legal: an asset classified as marital or separate under the wrong rule, an asset never valued, a value with no support in the record, findings too thin to review. A property division cannot be modified later for changed circumstances, and undisclosed assets are usually a trial-court matter under the five-year rule.
How do I appeal a magistrate's order in Colorado?
Not directly. For magistrate orders issued on or after January 2, 2026, you first file a petition for review with the district court within 28 days of the date the order was written, dated and signed. A motion to reconsider filed with the magistrate within 14 days pauses that clock. The district judge has 91 days to rule, or the magistrate’s order is deemed adopted. Only then does the 49-day deadline to appeal to the Court of Appeals begin. Skipping the review step forfeits the appeal.
What is magistrate review?
A district judge’s review of a magistrate’s final order, on a written petition that states the alleged errors with particularity. The judge accepts the magistrate’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, decides legal questions fresh, and may adopt, reject or modify the order or send an issue back to the magistrate. If no transcript was requested, the judge presumes the record supports the findings. The judge’s ruling, or the deemed adoption after 91 days, is what can then be appealed.
Is an appeal a new trial?
No. The Court of Appeals does not hear witnesses or retry the case. It reads the written order, the transcripts and the exhibits and decides whether the trial court made a legal error that affected the result. When it finds one, the usual remedy is a remand: the trial court decides the issue again under the correct law, sometimes on the existing record and sometimes after a new hearing on that issue.
Can I submit new evidence on appeal?
Generally no. The record on appeal is what was filed, offered and said in the trial court. Evidence that existed but was never offered cannot be added, and the appellate court cannot repair a failure of proof. Evidence that was wrongly excluded may be an issue if an offer of proof was made. Fraud discovered after the judgment, or a change in circumstances, belongs in the trial court under the rules for relief from a judgment or a motion to modify.
What if my ex lied in court?
The judge who heard the testimony decides whom to believe, and appellate courts almost never second-guess credibility. An appeal is not a chance to bring in new witnesses to prove the lie. If proof of the lie was offered and wrongly excluded, that ruling may be reviewable. If fraud or misconduct comes to light after the judgment, a motion for relief under C.R.C.P. 60(b) in the trial court, generally within 182 days, is the usual path, and assets left out of the financial disclosures have a five-year rule.
How much does a family-law appeal cost in Colorado?
As planning budgets for serious appellate representation, not market averages: an initial case and record review about $5,000 to $10,000; a petition for magistrate review $10,000 to $20,000 or more; a focused appeal with a limited record $25,000 to $40,000 or more; a typical contested family-law appeal $35,000 to $60,000 or more; complex appeals and cross-appeals higher. Transcripts, filing fees ($253 in the Court of Appeals) and other outside costs are additional.
How long does a divorce appeal take in Colorado?
Longer than most people expect. In the Judicial Branch’s most recent statistical report, for fiscal year 2024, domestic-relations appeals decided by opinion averaged 428 days, about fourteen months, from the notice of appeal to the opinion, and about 60 more days to the mandate. A remand to the trial court, or a petition to the Supreme Court, adds time. Those are averages, not predictions for a given case.
Can I win a family-law appeal?
Sometimes, when there is a preserved legal error that mattered. Reversal is difficult, and many family-law rulings are affirmed because appellate courts defer to supported factual findings and discretionary decisions. The honest answer for a specific case comes from reading the order, the transcript and the exhibits against the standard of review, not from a percentage. The Judicial Branch publishes no reversal rate for these appeals, and I do not quote one.
What happens if I lose the appeal?
The trial court’s order stands, and what you spent on the appeal is not recovered. The prevailing side may file a bill of costs, and may ask for appellate attorney fees, which in family cases turn on the parties’ relative finances and are often sent to the trial court to decide. Rehearing and Supreme Court review are possible but narrow. Losing an appeal does not bar a later modification based on circumstances that genuinely change.
Does an appeal stop the order from being enforced?
No. A notice of appeal does not stay a family-court order. Support and maintenance keep coming due, and the parenting plan stays in effect. A money judgment is stayed automatically only for 14 days after entry; after that, stopping collection generally requires a supersedeas bond, presumptively 125 percent of the judgment. Stays of parenting and other non-money orders are discretionary and are requested first in the district court. No one can promise a stay.
Can temporary orders be appealed?
It depends on the kind. Temporary maintenance, child support and attorney-fee orders can be appealed immediately as final judgments, and that right is lost once permanent orders are entered, so waiting can forfeit it. Temporary custody and parenting-time orders cannot be appealed. If a magistrate entered the temporary order, the district-court review step still comes first. A temporary order can also be revisited in the trial court before the decree.
What does abuse of discretion mean?
It is the standard for most family-law decisions: property division, maintenance, the support amount, parenting time and fee awards. The question is not whether the appellate judges would have decided differently. It is whether the decision was manifestly arbitrary, unreasonable or unfair. A ruling within the range of reasonable choices on the evidence is affirmed, even if another judge might have ruled the other way. A decision resting on the wrong legal standard is a different question, reviewed de novo.
What does de novo review mean?
The appellate court decides the question itself, without deferring to the trial court. It applies to pure questions of law: what a statute means, whether the court applied the correct legal standard, jurisdiction. It is the most favorable standard for an appellant, but it reaches only the legal question; the facts found beneath it still receive deference if the record supports them.
What does clearly erroneous mean?
It is the standard for findings of fact. A finding stands if the record supports it, even if the appellate judges might have weighed the evidence differently; in Colorado family cases a finding is clearly erroneous essentially when the record does not support it. A district judge applies the same standard to a magistrate’s findings. It is why credibility findings, and choices between competing witnesses, are rarely overturned.
Can I appeal without a transcript?
You can file, but the appeal is usually crippled. Without a transcript the appellate court presumes the evidence supported the trial court’s findings, and you may be unable to show that an issue was preserved. Transcripts are requested through the court, priced per page ($3.60 at the ordinary rate), and must be designated within 7 days of the notice of appeal. If none can be prepared, the rules allow a statement of the evidence instead, a weaker substitute.
Do most family-law appeals succeed?
There is no official answer: the Judicial Branch’s statistical reports do not publish a reversal rate for domestic-relations appeals, so any percentage you see did not come from the court. What the standards of review make clear is that reversal is difficult, because appellate courts defer to supported findings and to discretionary decisions, which cover most of family law. Appeals with a preserved legal error that changed the result are the ones with a realistic chance.
What if I think the judge was biased?
Bias is a serious claim, and it is different from an adverse ruling. Unfavorable rulings, even many of them, are not evidence of bias on their own. A claim that a judge should not hear a case is generally raised first in the trial court, promptly, by a motion to disqualify with supporting facts. On appeal the practical question is almost always narrower: which specific ruling was legally wrong, and was it preserved.
I represented myself at trial. Can I still appeal?
Yes, and the same rules apply: the deadlines, preservation, the record and the standards of review. Self-represented parties file in the Court of Appeals on paper, because e-filing is not available to them. The Colorado Bar Association’s Civil Appeals Clinic offers a free, confidential one-hour meeting with a volunteer lawyer, and its Appellate Pro Bono Program places a small number of financially qualified cases with volunteer counsel. Fee waivers are requested first in the trial court.
Can I appeal after the deadline has passed?
Rarely. The Court of Appeals can extend the 49-day deadline by up to 35 days, and only on a showing of excusable neglect; it cannot extend it further. The amended magistrate rule contains no provision for extending the 28-day petition deadline. After that the question becomes whether another procedure fits: a motion for relief from the judgment, the five-year rule for undisclosed assets, or a modification based on changed circumstances. Each has its own requirements.
Can I ask the Colorado Supreme Court to review my case?
Only after the Court of Appeals decides, and only by asking. A petition for a writ of certiorari is due within 42 days after the Court of Appeals’ final judgment, or within 28 days after a petition for rehearing is denied. The docket fee is $225. Review is discretionary: the Court decides whether to take the case at all. A C.A.R. 21 original proceeding is a separate, extraordinary remedy for narrow situations, not a substitute for an appeal.
Where to go next.
The next page in this chapter, the pages that belong with it, and the blog posts on the same question.
From the blog, on this topic
Where a divorce can be filed, where the money can be decided, and where the children's case belongs are three different questions. Colorado's 91-day domicile…
Sept 16, 2026Colorado's New Child Support Law: What Changed on March 1, 2026Colorado rebuilt child support on March 1, 2026: a schedule that now runs to $40,000 a month, a credit for every overnight in place of the 93-night cliff, a…
Sept 15, 2026What Mediation Does in a Colorado Divorce, and What It Cannot DoNearly every Denver-area court sends divorcing spouses to mediation before a contested hearing. How a session actually runs, what makes it work, what it cannot…
Colorado family-law appellate case review: the order, the record, and an honest answer before you spend.
Have these ready: the date of the written order; whether a judge or a magistrate entered it; the county; the type of order (permanent orders, post-decree, temporary); whether a post-trial motion or a petition for magistrate review was filed; how long the hearing lasted; the amount at issue; the error you believe the court made, in a sentence; whether transcripts exist; and whether you had a lawyer at trial. Dates and categories only: do not send financial details, information about your children or anything confidential through this form. The first conversation tells you whether the deadline is still open and whether a full record review is worth its cost. Your note reaches my office directly; during business hours we call you back within the hour and run the conflicts check.
Talk to us about your case.
303-507-5529One call. A real person picks up, hears you out, and tells you how we would handle what you are facing and what to do first. No phone tree, no sales pitch, no obligation. Your first conversation is with our intake paralegal, who will get you to Aaron fast.
Rather write? Send a short note and during business hours we call you back within the hour.