A wedding ring resting on a hundred-dollar bill
Chapter I · The Money

Practice Area  ·  Executives

Executive compensation in divorce.

An executive's balance sheet is mostly promises: bonuses not yet paid, awards not yet vested, deferred compensation not yet distributable. Divorce forces one question onto all of it — is this property to divide, or income to share? The answer is worth arguing about.

Consultation
In person in Greenwood Village, or by video
A paid working session, not a free call. Fee quoted when you schedule
Schedule a consultation
Call
My assistant reviews new inquiries and runs the conflicts check before we talk
Write
Read by a person, usually the same business day. No chatbot, no call center

Property or Income

The most consequential line in the case.

Compensation earned during the marriage is generally marital even if paid later; awards granted for purely future services may remain separate until an enforceable right exists — and most executive packages sit somewhere between, part reward for the past and part retention for the future. Colorado allocates the marital share of unvested awards by their purpose and timing, which is why reading what each award was actually granted for is where the analysis starts. Getting the grant documents and reading what each award was for is where this analysis actually starts — and it's the step most divisions skip.

The same dollars can't be both: an award counted as property in the division shouldn't also be counted as income for support. Policing that line — the executive's version of the double-dip — is a recurring high-stakes issue.

The Practical Layer

Plans have rules; orders must respect them.

Deferred comp plans, LTIPs, and severance arrangements come with their own governing documents — distribution schedules, forfeiture and clawback provisions, transfer restrictions, and for public-company insiders, trading-window realities. A settlement that ignores the plan documents produces orders the plan administrator can't honor. I draft divisions that work inside the plans as written: if-as-when payment structures, tax gross-up terms, and security for the promises — because in this corner of divorce law, the drafting is the outcome.

Common Questions

What executives ask between meetings.

My bonus gets paid in March for last year's work. Is it marital?

If it was earned during the marriage, its later payment date doesn't change its character — the earning period controls, not the payroll calendar. The messier questions come with multi-year awards, and those turn on the grant terms.

My unvested awards might be worth nothing. How can they be divided?

Through structures that share the risk: if-as-when divisions that pay the former spouse only when and if you actually receive value, in the marital proportion. You shouldn't buy out uncertainty at a certain price.

Will my company get involved in my divorce?

Minimally, if it's handled well. Plan documents get produced, and occasionally a plan administrator confirms mechanics — but a properly drafted order works within the plan's rules, which is exactly what keeps your employer at arm's length from your case.

Engagement

Bring the grant documents. The answers are written in them.

A consultation is a scheduled working session — in person in Greenwood Village or by video — in which we go through your situation and I tell you what I would do. It is a paid meeting, not a free call and not a sales pitch; my assistant quotes the consultation fee when you schedule. There is no chatbot here: the contact form and the phone both reach my office, my assistant reviews every inquiry personally, and the meeting goes on my calendar. Please hold the confidential details until we have run a conflicts check.

Write to me

A brief, non-confidential note. Read by a person, usually the same business day.

  1. My assistant reads your note and runs a conflicts check, usually the same business day.
  2. She calls to schedule the consultation and quotes the fee.
  3. We meet, in Greenwood Village or by video, and you leave knowing what I would do first.